JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)August 24, 2010

A- de 2010

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Gabriel Eduardo Mendoza Martelo

✓Claimant Jorge Enrique Gaviria Alturo

✓
Topic · hard data
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Recurso De Suplica
  • Procede únicamente respecto del auto que rechaza la admisión de la demanda de inconstitucionalidad
Corte Constitucional
  • Rechazar recurso de súplica por falta de competencia contra auto A243/10 en trámite de seguimiento de sentencia T-1234/08
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de súplica interpuesto contra el auto 243/10 por medio de cual se resolvió suspender las órdenes de arresto y multas proferidas contra los Directores o liquidadores de CAJANAL.

Se aclara que la Corte Constitucional no es competente para conocer y decidir del recurso de súplica interpuesto contra el mencionado auto, por lo tanto se rechaza la solicitud por improcedente.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Rechazar por improcedente el recurso de suplica presentado por el ciudadano Jorge Enrique Gaviria Alturo contra el Auto 243 de julio 22 de 2010 proferido por la Sala Cuarta de Revision de Tutela dentro del tramite de seguimiento de la Tutela T-1234 de 2008.
  2. Segundo. Contra el presente auto no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.